IDFC First Bank Net Worth: CEO Name, Head Office Location
IDFC First Bank Net Worth
IDFC First Bank may be a tiny privately-owned bank but the rate at which it’s growing is simply amazing. You’ve probably seen its name mentioned in their advertising campaign, which is also doing well. This is why we’re going to give you details about the bank’s current status and its current status, so let’s look at details such as IDFC First Bank Net Worth the CEO, Head Office.
| Name of the bank | IDFC First Bank |
| Year of establishment | 2015 (renamed after Dec 2018 merger) |
| Head Office | Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
| CEO Name | V. Vaidyanathan |
| Net worth (shareholders Equity) | About around Rs38,156 million (Mar 2025) |
| Total revenue | Rs36,257 crore |
Bank Profile
IDFC First Bank began its operations in the year 2015 when IDFC Limited established a new private bank. The new institution was officially opened in October in the year. The company changed its name following an amalgamation to Capital First in December 2018. In the subsequent year a reverse merger led to the bank becoming an affiliate to IDFC Limited (the holding company) that later merged with the Bank. This is how the current bank got its name that is doing extremely very well. Speaking of their main headquarters the one that is located situated in Mumbai.
Net Worth
The net worth of the IDFC First Bank, as of March 2025, was 38,156 crore. The sum is made up mainly of reserves and equity in order to provide you with an understanding of the present state in the financial condition of IDFC First Bank. In 2025 the market capitalization of the bank was $59,867 million (on the 2nd November 2025 actually) which gives the investors’ perspective of the value of equity in the bank.
Recent Updates and Outlook
According to reports from the quarter, during the 2nd quarter in fiscal year 2025-26 the bank’s net profit increased by 75.6 percent year-on-year to close to Rs352 crores mostly due to a decrease in the provisioning. Net interest margins were close to 5.59 percent and the growth of loans and deposits remained strong. The asset quality was emphasized by the company’s management as being better, while the microfinance sector was less stressed.
About The Author
